At school in days past, it was a common joke to say you were learning the three r’s: reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic. But, in times of economic downturn, it’s common to learn a more chastening lesson about the two r’s: recession and redundancy.
Global recession has made redundancy a fear for many, and a lamentable fact for others. Naturally, there will be a rise in disputes over redundancy, so it pays for employers to make sure they are fully versed in their redundancy policies and procedures.
With statutory redundancy pay in place, there is less concern over pay-outs: these will be itemised and explained and follow fairly clear-cut procedures regarding maximum level of pay-outs, qualification periods and amounts payable without tax.
Problems are more likely to occur with employees feeling they have been treated badly or that their job isn’t been made redundant for the right reasons.
As a form of dismissal, redundancy can occur for many reasons: new technology making certain tasks redundant; relocation of a business, cost-cutting due to reduced revenues or the job you were employed to do has ceased to exist, which can itself be caused by numerous reasons.
Redundancy can be hugely distressing for some employees, and can understandably provoke an emotional response. After all, when someone is hit by the worry of how they’re going to feed their family or pay their mortgages to the way they’ve become used to, with a salary which is about to cease, it’s often difficult to be objective about ‘business needs’.
That’s why there is an onus upon employers to tread carefully, sensitively and follow procedure. Consultation needs to be carried out, with employees facing redundancy allowed to have their input and suggest alternatives. Failure to provide consultation can lead to unfair dismissal claims.
Another area for potential problems comes when a proportion of staff are being made redundant. Objective and fair assessment needs to take place backed by evidence throughout this process.
Beliefs that the criteria was unfair or people felt their selection was far from objective due to a misplaced comment or skewed criteria can again lead to unfair dismissal claims. And, the need to find alternative employment if it exists can also be highly controversial, with staff feeling demoted or pushed into unsuitable roles.
Clearly, there are sensitive footfalls to navigate, which is why guidance from correct procedure and being able to generate a papertrail of all communications with staff regarding redundancy is absolutely vital.
Papertrail, with its comprehensive and updated employer guidelines and unique ability to record trails digitally, is ideally placed to help employers comfortably traverse the often complex and contentious redundancy procedures, which sadly are often all too commonplace during periods of recession.